Emilien Demanet vs Matic Kriznik Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Kriznik excels in second serve performance, winning 49.3% of points, outperforming Demanet who secures 42.77% in this aspect. This might indicate Kriznik has a slight edge when it comes to serve reliability under pressure.
• In return game stats, Demanet is stronger, capturing 45.74% of opponents' second serve points compared to Kriznik's 35.48%. Could this reflect Demanet's superior ability to counter serve effectively?
• For first serve returns, Kriznik holds a minor advantage with a 35.96% point win rate, slightly higher than Demanet's 33.27%, suggesting a competitive edge in dealing with powerful serves.
• Under pressure, Kriznik tends to save more breakpoints, achieving a rate of 61.11% against Demanet's 47.3%. This suggests Kriznik may be more resilient during critical match moments.
• Analyzing overall performance, Demanet holds a better win rate over the last year at 53.33%, compared to Kriznik's 44.44%, indicating Demanet may have more consistent results in match play.
• Kriznik shows a preference for clay court success, with a 38% win rate, whereas Demanet thrives on hard surfaces, boasting a 57% win rate. The match surface could impact who is most favored to win.
• Despite both primarily playing $10K level tournaments, Demanet's higher win percentage (54.24%) compared to Kriznik's (44.44%) suggests a competitive advantage at this level.
• In deciding set scenarios, Demanet prevails more often, winning 41% of such situations in contrast to Kriznik's 33%. This could imply an advantage in endurance or mental toughness.
• Breaking serve efficiency has Demanet slightly ahead, converting 34.88% of opportunities compared to Kriznik's 33.33%, giving Demanet a marginal edge in capitalizing on opponents' vulnerabilities.

Editorial Prediction (July 17, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match between Kriznik and Demanet promises to be intriguing, with both players showcasing distinct strengths.

Kriznik’s formidable second serve and breakpoint saving ability could be significant assets, potentially tilting close games in their favor. Additionally, their clay court proficiency might be an advantage should the match be played on this surface.

Conversely, Demanet exhibits strong overall match performance, aided by their effective return game and higher success in deciding sets. These attributes could offer a competitive advantage, especially if the match becomes prolonged or is played on hard surfaces.

Considering these factors, Demanet appears to be the favorite due to their consistency, returns proficiency, and prior win success, suggesting they are most likely to win this upcoming tennis match.